Interior Department Recommends Legislative Options to Resolve Tribal Trust Fund Balance Disputes

Media Contact: Thomas W. Sweeney (202) 219-4150 Stephanie Hanna (202) 208-3171
For Immediate Release: December 6, 1996

The Department of the Interior has presented to Congress an initial report that outlines proposed legislative settlement options for resolving disputed balances in Tribal trust accounts. The report and recommendations are in response to a five-year study by a national accounting firm which examined billions of dollars in Tribal trust fund transactions handled by the Bureau of Indian Affairs for a 20-year period beginning in 1972.

"We are committed to resolving these issues in a manner that is fair to the Tribes and fair to the public, and that does justice," said Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt. "Where the government has been found to owe money, we will pay it, with interest."

The study, which was undertaken for the BIA by the national accounting firm Arthur Andersen, LLP, determined that 86 percent - or $15.3 billion - of the $17.7 billion the BIA handled in Tribal trust fund non-investment transactions from July 1972 to September 1992 could be reconciled, i.e., supporting documents could be located. Of the reconciled transactions, Arthur Andersen detected an error rate of only .01%. Other components of the project assessed the accuracy of other transactions, the reasonableness of investments, and the propriety of income collected. Overall, slightly less than half of the errors detected were to the detriment of the Tribes and the balance were to the benefit of the Tribes.

Where the BIA was found to have made errors to the detriment of a Tribe, the Department proposes that funds be restored to the Tribe, with interest. Where a Tribe may owe the government money after netting all errors relating to that Tribe's account, the amount would be forgiven. For claims where a Tribe disputes a transaction based on the Tribe's own documentation, or for claims where a Tribe disputes the BIA's documentation used to reconcile a transaction, those claims would be addressed through mediation.

There were also transactions in the amount of $2.4 billion that could not be reconciled, meaning that during the course of the study, the BIA was not able to locate documentation to support the accuracy of the transaction as reflected in the BIA's books (known as the general ledger). The report indicates that with respect to three quarters of this amount, there is relatively little risk that a Tribe did not have use of its own money (although the funds conceivably could have been credited to the wrong account of that Tribe). As a result, settlement options with regard to the unreconciled transactions will focus on the remaining $575 million in transactions. Options to address these transactions, as well as any other claims that Tribes may have involving transactions outside the scope of the 20-year study, will be the focus of consultation efforts by the Department with the Tribes.

"The overriding objective of this settlement is to achieve fairness and justice with respect to Tribal trust account balances," states the Interior Department report. "We are committed to doing the best job we can, recognizing the limitations of what has occurred in the past and the available information, to restore funds to Tribal trust accounts that have suffered losses as a result of inadequacies in the Department's management and accounting systems. The effort must be principled and undertaken in good faith, while, at the same time, protecting the public fiscally where little or no reasonable likelihood of loss exists."

The Interior Department was guided by the following objectives in formulating its legislative proposals:

  • achieve a settlement that is fair
  • achieve the most resource-efficient settlement of claims (in terms of conserving federal government and Tribal time, money, and staff, including attorneys' and expert witness fees)
  • encourage settlement by providing incentives to settle and by providing disincentives to litigation
  • use the most informal settlement processes available rather than litigation to encourage Tribal participation
  • obtain funding for the settlement without reducing appropriations for the BIA budget and Tribal programs
  • achieve final agreement on account balances through September 30, 1995, as required in the Act, as an agreed upon starting point for the future

The Interior Department report was submitted by Secretary Babbitt to the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs and the House Committee on Natural Resources. The Department will be consulting with Tribes on the options contained in the report, including meetings in January in Portland, Oregon; Denver, Colorado; Phoenix, Arizona; and Washington, D.C. It will submit further proposals to Congress for settling Tribal trust fund account balances in April 1997. In addition, early next spring, the Special Trustee, appointed by the President to reform the Department's trust management systems, will submit his strategic plan to the Secretary and Congress for bringing the trust accounting and management functions up to industry standards.